Chromatiaceae Details: NCBI 1046, gram-negative or unknown [family]

| Chromatiaceae| Chromatiaceae Bavendamm 1924 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Imhoff 1984| Chromatiaceae Bavendamm 1924 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Sisinthy et al. 2017| purple sulfur bacteria| Thiocapsaceae| Thiocapsaceae Bavendamm 1924

1. Water quality: In certain environments, such as lakes, ponds, or wastewater treatment systems, the presence of Chromatiaceae bacteria can contribute to the biogeochemical cycling of sulfur compounds and other nutrients. While this is not directly harmful to humans, changes in water quality or nutrient levels in aquatic ecosystems could have indirect effects on human health, such as altered aquatic biodiversity or impacts on drinking water sources.

2. Sulfur metabolism: Chromatiaceae bacteria play important roles in sulfur metabolism and cycling, which can have implications for the production and transformation of sulfur-containing compounds in aquatic environments. While this is primarily of ecological significance, certain sulfur compounds produced by microbial activity could potentially have toxic effects on humans if present in high concentrations in drinking water or food sources.

3. Ecological balance: Chromatiaceae bacteria contribute to the microbial communities and food webs in aquatic ecosystems, interacting with other organisms and influencing ecosystem dynamics. Changes in the abundance or activity of Chromatiaceae bacteria, such as due to environmental disturbances or pollution, could have cascading effects on ecosystem health and services, which may indirectly impact human well-being.

The above data is from 1000 Healthy Individuals done using Shotgun(10 Millions reads) provide courtesy of Precision Biome.

A lot more information is available when you are logged in and raise the display level

Other Sources for more information:

• Immune Epitope Database
• The NCBI taxonomy database
• UniProt
• Immune Epitope Taxonomy Database (IEDB)
• AI Engines For more Details: Perplexity  Kagi Labs  You 

More Information

Statistics

NCBI

Data Punk

End Products Produced

Lab Reporting

Different labs use different software to read the sample. See this post for more details.
One lab may say you have none, another may say you have a lot! - This may be solely due to the software they are using to estimate.
We deem lab specific values using values from the KM method for each specific lab to be the most reliable.

Desired Levels Suggestions for Chromatiaceae

• Lab Low and High are calculated using the formula that most labs use: Mean - 1.95 Standard Deviation to Mean + 1.95 Standard Deviation

These are values that are computed from lab specific samples and are in percentage

Lab	Frequency	Average	Median	Minimum	Maximum	Std.Dev.	Skew	25 - 75 Percentile	5 - 95 Percentile	Lab Ranges	Box-Plot-Whiskers	Harmonic Mean	Geometric Mean	Obs.
BiomeSight	0.8283	0.0088	0.005	0.001	0.223	0.0132	0.8659	0.003 - 0.01	0.002 - 0.026	-0.017 - 0.0347	-0.0075 - 0.0205	0.0039	0.0056	3069
BiomeSightRdp	0.5556	0.0051	0.004	0.001	0.021	0.0054	0.598	0.002 - 0.0065	0.001 - 0.0147	-0.0054 - 0.0155	-0.0048 - 0.0133	0.0024	0.0034	15
Medivere	0.8571	0.002	0.0013	0.0006	0.0052	0.0018	1.1825	0.0007 - 0.0027	0.0006 - 0.0047	-0.0015 - 0.0056	-0.0023 - 0.0058	0.0011	0.0014	6
Thorne	0.9206	0.0021	0.0016	0.0001	0.0184	0.0021	0.6736	0.0011 - 0.0024	0.0004 - 0.0051	-0.0021 - 0.0062	-0.0008 - 0.0043	0.0011	0.0015	174
Thryve	0.5105	0.0109	0.0033	0.0001	1.208	0.0651	0.3507	0.002 - 0.0059	0.001 - 0.0237	-0.1161 - 0.1379	-0.0038 - 0.0118	0.0023	0.0038	633
Vitract	0.0687	0.0022	0.0022	0.0012	0.0032	0.0014	0	0.0017 - 0.0027	0.0013 - 0.0031	-0.0006 - 0.005	0.0002 - 0.0042	0.048	0.002	55

External Reference Ranges for Chromatiaceae

Chromatiaceae (NCBI 1046) per million

Source of Ranges	Low Boundary	High Boundary	Low Boundary %age	High Boundary %age
PrecisionBiome	1.695210266916547E-05	7.217500387923792E-05	0	0
Thorne (20/80%ile)	20.66	45.47	0.0021	0.0045

To see medical conditions associated you may be logged in

And display level must be raised above public.

I would like to know what can change the quality that I have

• If I want to know that a substance also changes, then I just click on it
• If I want to know which study this information comes from, then I just clink in increases or decreases

Data Contradictions — Limits of Certainity

To get the list of studies, you must be logged in and raise your display level.

🧙? Search Hints:

General Substance	Specific Substance	Effect
Diet Style	dietary fiber	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Diet Style	Fiber, total dietary	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Diet Style	High-fibre diet {Whole food diet}	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Diet Style	Slow digestible carbohydrates. {Low Glycemic}	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Food (excluding seasonings)	blueberry	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Food (excluding seasonings)	fruit	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Food (excluding seasonings)	fruit/legume fibre	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.